CO129-394 - Governor Sir May & Public Offices - 1912 [12] — Page 508

497

-noidnevno od asw sometno end to Jostdo Visminq

notaalmoo farignane say to anoi¿uloasЯ musico add eelis

VISgrAI VTSv beɔmovbo ybestia beri mroter müiq0

Istedem s Je moit-req009 &Loteres end of vintem adnant

eesnido eat of nevig bed sibni dow

Joneretпo Jnsasig add 11 neve bre

tiseren of Baol

र्

voiloq mulyo-ijne

bixow revia ault alumise udo ani (Jun of aroo of snow

to Joequer ai actuaser beacqorq SHT

.Jpe of Suninco

-nd bettupey broart verto sdo no

ente000 bis exidoron

*

meda xahmen of mold.'90009 BOL JOSKSST36 IsnottumOJ

-98m aew noijnevnoj s Secqrug atdt tot bne,bvidoelto

won noiteseled reoitemA eid aasien reve .Visa80

Jaert to Joette 9: sved blow dołdw setvoo ≈ bsaoɖoTŲ

bra esпetroqmi viening to an aeloitte muigo end gni

-UT BIJJHI Vieviðbusqros idtw dostïo odni med÷ guignird

brs and lycom add $12,2rewof ebladuo ou somerel

-dua en bios sosig Howd a exet blow ealsite entao00

amoo blvcs gold Toted acesorų 18gnol foum & of Jost

VIJsetisq ditair stubsɔong Bins Joel MI

3 HONG

.90TQ) OJMI

.Tsiteyotis bevisita grisd Tist of boel IIsw

doli. molttomoo sile of beaoquo viispijadqme 2RAW e3xUOD

sideaneqalbnt as wob biel bad Jл9MITEVоð a'y‡uetsM «fH

18 bra,sumere troƆ odd ni J19q antded Niedd of

CALLI.

William Meyer said that he must therefore, on behalf

of His Majesty's Government, absolutely oppose the

solution proposed by Dr. Hamilton Wright being regarded

as even an open question.

The Russian Delegate, following, expressed his

concurrence in this view, and said that his instruc-

tions would not permit his taking further part in the

discussions should the condition on which His

Majesty's Government had entered the Conference be set

aside.

Dr.

On a division the American proposal was negatived

by ten votes to one, the Delegations of China and

Persia, which usually follow America when a vote is

called, taking the other side in this instance.

Hamilton Wright thereupon announced that he would

raise the matter again by a Resolution proposing

direct action by the full Conference, and a copy of

this resolution, which we enclose, has just been for-

warded to us. We propose, when it comes up for dis-

cussion, to state that the objections raised to the

previous resolution apply, of course, equally to the

present one, and that we shall regard its adoption ac

fatal to the work of the Conference and to the

condition